Images rather than colours are better in marketing
Images, rather than colours, are better at signalling product variety, according to research at the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science in the University of South Australia.
Researchers say product line extensions, one of the most common strategies to build a brand, are expensive, risky, and come with an average fail rate of about 40%.
This is the first study to audit industry practice on a large scale, and appraise this practice with consumer-based research.
The research, analysing the perceptions of 1,853 customers to 576 products in the US packaged goods market, showed that only 56% of product varieties had a colour that was commonly expected by category buyers.
“Colours are regularly used to identify brands – think purple for Cadbury or red for Coca-Cola – these are highly valuable brand assets that should be protected,” says senior marketing scientist Dr Ella Ward.
“In our study we found that competing brands use similar colours to signal 84% of the variant types analysed, but consumers associated a colour with only 56% of those types.
“Concerningly, there was a disconnect between colours used in practice, and those expected by customers, with these aligning only 16% of the time.
“When we assessed images however, we found that 23% more consumers were able to link these to product variants.”
The research draws on consumer research on how consumers identify and recall information about brands in their memories.
Dr Ward says the findings suggest images are a more explicit signal of product variety than colour.
Read the full article in AdNews.
